<-CHM107 Home Page
The Early Atom: Developing our understanding of the Atom
In the previous tutorial I talked about our need to combat chaos by ways to simplify and classify the world around us. That tutorial was focused on the development of the Periodic Table of the Elements, which allowed us to classify all of elements in the cosmos, which reduced the feeling of chaos.
Elements are made up of atoms. So we can't really separate the understanding of elements and the understanding of atoms. So part of this tutorial will overlap with the tutorial on how elements were classified with the Periodic Table.
Around 440 B.C. Empedocles suggested that there were four elements: Water, Earth, Air, and Fire. It seemed logical because when things caught fire, moisture is released, air can be felt coming up from it, and the ashes show the earth that it contained. Classifying all matter as only being made of four elements certainly simplified our view of the world.
|Around 400 B.C. another Greek philosopher, Democritus, agreed there were four elements but he proposed that there was a limit to how small an element could be divided.
|For example, he said matter may look smooth and solid, but if we could see it very, very close, then we would see that it's made of pieces. An analogy is a beach looks smooth from a distance, but up close we know it's made up of grains of sand.
|Again, he proposed that elements were composed of very small pieces that could no not be divided any further. He called these pieces Atoms after the Greek word for Indivisible.
Democritus was quite perceptive. In a manner similar to atoms, he proposed that the Milky Way was not milk nor clouds but a collection of millions of stars that individually are too small to see but all together they look like a cloud or liquid.
It is quite amazing that he saw this pattern at both the large scale of a galaxy and the small scale of atoms. The pattern is that we think we see something smooth, but that's only because of the limitaton of our vision or touch. On closer inspection, there's always individual pieces, not something continuous.
|Below is the image I use for the logo of CHM130. Here I put a red underline beneath some graphics that represent how the visualization of the atom has progressed.
|The upper left side of that graphic are the what Democritus thought atoms might look like. He believed that atoms of the different elements may have different shapes. That could account for the different look and behavior of the elements.
Around 340 B.C. Aristotle said he didn't believe in the theory of Atoms because you would be putting a restriction on the gods. If the gods wanted to divide an element to something smaller than an atom, they could. The concept that God or gods had unlimited power was quite popular and it kept people from accepting the idea of atoms (something indivisible) for about 2,000 years.
In addition Aristotle introduced the fifth element that he said all heavenly bodies (Sun, moon, and stars, etc.) were made of. He also said the fifth element could turn cheap metals into gold and cure disease and old age. This started alchemy, the pursuit of the 5th element.
Born in in Ireland in 1627 was Robert Boyle. He wrote a book called the "Skeptical Chemist." Now available on Amazon.com. Actually, a book about him and his book is available on Amazon.com.
His book urged chemists to abandon the view that elements are mystical substances. In other words he criticized Aristotle's supernatural fifth element and alchemy. Instead he promoted a philosophy that valued observation and experimentation.
ELEMENTS: Boyle also said the term, element, needs a precise meaning. An element is a substance not capable of being broken down or decomposed into simpler substances.
Earth cant be an element because it consists of
simpler substances like gold, mercury, iron, and so forth. These are elements
because they cant be broken down to something simpler. Later French
scientist Lavoisier would reinforce that notion.
AIR SUGGESTS PARTICLES (atoms): Boyle is most known for his work with gases. With the help of inventor Robert Hooke, he built an air pump. This allowed him to discover many things about the properties of air.
He discovered that air was required for combustion, respiration, and for sound.
Working with gases made him come to a conclusion about
the nature of matter (especially gases).
GAS IS ATOMS: Because of the nature of gases, he believed in the corpuscular theory of atoms agreeing with Democritus and disagreeing with Aristotle.
Corpuscular means that air is made up of particles. Others may have thought air to be more like a sponge or compressible liquid, but he thought air was made up of individual particles like atoms. These particles turned out to be a pair of nitrogen atoms and a pair oxygen atoms. Plus, some particles were single atoms of argon, neon, and krypton in the air.
|Born in England in 1766, John Dalton ressurected Democritus' idea of atoms. For example, this gold bar can only be divided to the point that you end up with pieces (spheres) of gold that can no longer be divided. In other words, they were atoms of gold.
These are the actual wood spheres that Dalton used as models for atoms. They are about 200 years old. Notice the holes drilled in them. I imagine he used them to connect atoms to other atoms to make compounds.
His models are actually very similar to the ones we buy now to model atoms and molecules. Yes, 200 years of technological advancements and our models are not any better.
|Dalton also proposed that all atoms of a particular element would be the same size and the same mass. Atoms of other elements would have their own unique size and mass.
His next idea would tremendously simplify the complexity of all the materials around us. Dalton suggested that substances around us were made up from a grouping of specific number of atoms of different elements. For example, a water molecule is made from two atoms of hydrogen and one atom of oxygen (upper right). If there's 2 oxygen atoms and 2 hydrogen atoms (lower right) then it's not water but something else (hydrogen peroxide). Salt is made from one sodium atom and one chlorine atom. Ammonia is made from 3 hydrogen atoms and one nitrogen atoms (lower left).
|In other words, we might see a lot of items around us, but there's just a handful of elements that have combined to make up what we see. For example, here carbon, hydrogen, nitrogen, and oxygen molecules make up most of the people, foods, and plastics. Aluminum and iron for the metal objects. Silicon and oxygen for the glass.
So Democritus, Boyle, and Dalton visualized atoms as particles. Democritus thought they had different shapes, but Dalton thought they were spherical. Dalton also thought the atoms of a particular element would all be the same size and weight. Atoms of other elements would have a different size and weight. This way of visualizing atoms is still popular 200 years later, and it's the way they are often drawn.
Born in 1776 in Italy Amadeo Avogadro was a public administrator, but developed an interest in science. After hearing a lecture from Joseph Gay-Lussac regarding gases, Avogadro decided to also study gases. He was impressed with Gay-Lussacs data collection methods which involved trips in balloons which rose 4.5 miles above sea level!
Example: 2 liters hydrogen combine with 1 liter oxygen to yield 2 liters water vapor. These simple whole number combinations hinted that gases are particles (atoms) that distribute themselves evenly.
|Gay-Lussac said When gases
react, the volumes consumed and produced,measured at the same temperature
and pressure, are in ratios of small whole numbers.
This statement reinforced what Dalton was saying
about atoms combining in simple ratios to form compounds.
Avogadro reasoned that if gases react in small whole numbers, then all elements in gas form must distribute themselves equally and according to number. In other words, one liter of hydrogen has the same number of molecules as a liter of oxygen. Measuring gas volume provides a way to indirectly count atoms, which means you can determine what proportions elements combine to form molecules. This gives you its formula. A pretty good trick when you think that everything is invisible. In the example shown, it takes twice as many hydrogen atoms as oxygen atoms to make water vapor, so water's formula ought to be H2O. That's was a huge accomplishment to come up with a formula for something invisibly small.
|So the work of Avogadro and Gay-Lussac helped confirm the idea that atoms of different elements joined in simple ratios to form molecules (compounds). The atoms were still believed to be solid and indivisible, but that was about to be change.
In 1897 Sir John Joseph Thomson discovered that electrons can be stripped off of metal atoms. He did this by using a glass tube that had most of the air removed. In the tube were two metal plates. One had a high negative charge and the other a high positive charge.
Thomson discovered that the "beam could be bent by magnetism or electrical charge. He also measured that the particles in the beam were a couple of thousand times lighter than the hydrogen atom. He concluded the particles had been stripped off atoms. This was the discovery of electrons and the realization that the atom (meaning indivisible) had actually been divided because the electrons of the atom had been stripped away.
Plum Pudding Model:
Thomson proposed that the atom had these negatively charged corpuscles (later called electrons) that floated in a cloud of positive charge. So the electrons were like plums baked in a bowl of pudding. The positive charges (protons) filled the whole atom (pudding).
|A famous experiment by Ernest Rutherford, revealed something new about a proton. A radioactive source emitted alpha particles that shot out in one direction towards a thin sheet of gold foil. The particles appeared to pass right threw the gold foil as if is wasn't there. Flashes of light would appear on the fluorescent screen as the alpha particles passed through the foil and slammed into it. Surprisingly, ever once in awhile an alpha particle would hit the screen off to the side and some even bounced backwards. (roll cursor over image to see animation).
|The explanation for this behavior was that the positive proton was not spread out over the whole atom, but concentrated in the middle of the atom. In other words, almost the entire mass of the atom was in a tiny area in the center (the nucleus). That's why this fast moving alpha particle would usually miss the tiny nucleus, but if it got real close, it would be pushed away by the positive repulsion of the protons in the nucleus. Sometime the alpha particle would hit almost head-on causing it to bounce backward.
|The last experiment was done in 1909. This concludes the early development of explaining matter as consisting of atoms and how the atoms were perceived (Atomic Theory).
Number of different visitors (not just hits) since Jan. 24, 2013